【美今詩歌集】【作者:童驛采】1999年~2020年 |訪問首頁|
伊能靜書院
   

伊能靜書院

 找回密碼
 註冊發言
搜索
查看: 2|回復: 0

Preparing AI music stems for a second opinion

[複製鏈接]

4

主題

0

回帖

18

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
18
發表於 1 小時前 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
Recently I have been trying to understand a high, repeating texture in one generated track. It may be part of the arrangement, but it also sounds slightly mechanical when the mix gets quiet. I first noticed it on headphones, then checked the same section through small speakers and heard a softer version there too. That made me curious rather than certain. Rather than guess, I remove extra limiting on one playback. Once the section repeats, I note a short description for later listening. I opened a spectrogram and saw a faint high band near the moments that bothered me, although I know a picture alone cannot tell me whether the sound is a fault. fixsuno.top seemed useful as a basic diagnostic note while I worked out what to listen for next. I am trying to avoid treating every unusual detail as damage, because some of the best parts of generated music are unexpected. My next step is to compare a fresh export, then make notes on the exact timestamps before considering any repair. For those who use both ears and visual tools, what convinces you that a strange high-frequency detail is a repeatable problem? Is there a basic check that helps separate curiosity from over-editing?
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊發言

本版積分規則

手機版|伊能靜書院

GMT+8, 2026-9-17 03:04 , Processed in 0.022458 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表